A Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Now Sit Side by Side in Across England.
Within Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in properties just several yards from their wealthier counterparts in nearby Scartho village. One six-foot-tall barricade physically separates the two communities in the town of Grimsby, blocking off paths and streets that once connected them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” remarked a resident, aged 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
A Stark Pattern Across the Country
Analysis of government figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, at times over little more than a short distance of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where almost two-thirds of councils now contain a locality ranking as one of the poorest in the country.
This geographical widening of poverty has led to a sharp increase in the quantity of locations where disadvantaged and well-off people end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the most deprived neighbourhoods bordered one of the least deprived. This number increased to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the biggest in the country and painfully apparent. The wall transcends being just a metaphorical divide; it causes tangible difficulties for everyday life.
- School runs that should take 15-20 minutes turn into an hour-long detour.
- Reaching important amenities like grocery stores, schools and care homes is hindered.
- The site often sees vandalism and loitering, with reports of rubbish being dumped over the wall and related problems.
“You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one local, motioning at the rusted barricade.
Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Challenges
Within Centre4, staff emphasise that need does not recognise addresses. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” said chief executive a community leader.
Despite ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, Scartho ranks among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
Echoes Elsewhere: Stanhope in Ashford
This phenomenon is repeated nationally. The Stanhope estate in Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in the country. It is closely bordered by spacious detached homes built in the early 2000s that are in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and living environment.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said Phil Hockley, aged 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people in the new builds don’t even speak to each other.”
The economic gap is clear: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent properties fetch about £410,000.
Residents speak of a tangible feeling of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” stated holistic health worker Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our amenities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the community problems here are to do with poverty.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a portrait of an ever more segregated society, where prosperity and deprivation are often awkwardly close neighbours.